The idea that individuals ought to marry before reaching 30, as it benefits their personal and societal well-being, is a subjective perspective necessitating thorough evaluation. I completely disagree with the notion as individuals must have the liberty to decide on marriage according to their own preparedness and preferences; enforced or hasty unions can result in adverse consequences and hinder societal advancement.
Firstly, pressuring individuals to marry early can result in hasty and ill-considered unions. To brief, rushing into marriage without emotional maturity and understanding can lead to higher divorce rates and emotional and financial burdens on individuals and society. Countries with a higher average age of marriage, for instance, often exhibit lower divorce rates, suggesting that encouraging delayed marriages can contribute to stronger and more stable unions. Additionally, delaying marriage fosters personal growth, education, and career development in early adulthood, while early marriage may limit opportunities and hinder individual potential.
Furthermore, this perpetuates traditional gender roles, pushing young women to prioritize marriage over personal aspirations and professional development, resulting in gender inequalities and restricting women’s opportunities for self-realization and progress. Moreover, it might lead to an increase in teenage pregnancies and related social challenges. Marriages at a young age often lead to early parenthood, adversely affecting the well-being of young parents and hindering their capacity to create a stable and nurturing atmosphere for their children. For example, in regions where early marriages are common, a higher occurrence of teenage pregnancies and related socio-economic challenges is evident.
In conclusion, I firmly concur that marriage is a deeply personal choice reliant on individual readiness and preferences, since it is vital to promote gender equality in marriage decisions, without hampering societal and individual progress.