Skip to content

Cambridge Volume 10 ESOL – GT Test B (9 Band Sample IELTS Writing Task 2 (C2 Level))

  • by

Website Navigation: Home / Resources / IELTS Writing Task 2 (Essay)

WRITING TASK 2 (ESSAY WRITING)

Cambridge Volume 10 ESOL - GT Test B

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:

The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Answer

A debate has arisen regarding the effectiveness of limiting car ownership to one per family as a means to curb traffic congestion and decrease pollution. I strongly beg to differ with this proposition as it would not only impose inessential constraints on individuals but also fail to address the underlying causes of traffic jams and pollution.

Firstly, one of the primary reasons for the disagreement is the economic implications and disregard of the unique circumstances and needs of each household. To brief, this solution disproportionately affects low-income families who heavily rely on personal vehicles for transportation. In rural areas or locations with inadequate public transportation infrastructure, for instance, having multiple automobiles per family might be essential for accessing employment opportunities and healthcare facilities. Moreover, families with working parents have distinct requirements and they may require separate cars to commute to their workplaces efficiently, considering different schedules and destinations

Furthermore, addressing traffic congestion and pollution requires a comprehensive approach that goes beyond capping car possession. Efforts should be directed towards promoting alternative modes of transport, such as cycling lanes, pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, and efficient public transportation networks to alleviate the given threats. Successful examples such as Copenhagen and Amsterdam demonstrate how prioritizing cycling infrastructure and investing in well-connected public transport systems have led to reduced car dependency and improved air quality. Moreover, encouraging the adoption of electric and hybrid cars coupled with investments in charging infrastructure can pave the way for more sustainable transportation options

In conclusion, the notion to fix one car per family as a remedy to combat automobile crowding and pollution is inadequate since it overlooks the economic repercussions and individual circumstances of households; nevertheless, by encompassing substitute modes of transportation, improving infrastructure, and promoting sustainable options can mitigate the displayed challenge.

Interested in mastering IELTS essay writing?

Click here to sign up for a free demo session now!

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!